Essay

The Story of WikiPortraits

  • photography
  • wikipedia
  • WikiPortraits
  • portraits
Vanessa Kirby's 2018 Wikipedia portrait
BeforeWikipedia portrait, 2018
Vanessa Kirby - Wikipedia photo by Jay Dixit
After

Vanessa Kirby - Wikipedia photo by Jay Dixit

Wikipedia’s articles are amazing but the photos are horrible.

There’s a reason for that. Wikipedia images have to carry a Creative Commons license, which means you contribute it to the public domain and anyone can use it for any purpose they want without paying you royalties.

What that means is that professional photographers don’t upload their photos to Wikipedia, since their business depends on charging money for their work.

As a result, most photos on Wikipedia come from amateurs — often, ordinary civilians being like, “Oh my God, look, it’s Pete Davidson!” and taking a photo with an iPhone.

Pete Davidson's former Wikipedia photo
For years, this was Pete Davidson’s Wikipedia photo.

It was eventually replaced with this:

Pete Davidson's newer Wikipedia portrait

Mr. Davidson’s current Wikipedia photo, which appears to be a screenshot with the background cut out.

While it may be amusing to see how awful some celebrities’ photos are, low-quality Wikipedia photos are a bigger problem than it may seem. When you google someone, their Wikipedia article is the first result that comes up - and their Wikipedia photo is the first thing you see. For a public figure, their Wikipedia photo basically becomes their official portrait - whether they like it or not.

Portraits on Wikipedia are so bad there are Instagram pages dedicated to them: Bad Wikipedia Photos, Bad Wiki Photos. Some photos are so bad that editors simply delete them, noting that having no photo at all would be better than some of the photos that get uploaded.

A screenshot of a low-quality Wikipedia portrait discussed online

Wikipedia editors pulled down this photo, deeming that having no photo at all would be more useful and informative to the public than displaying whatever this is.

My friend Jenny 8. Lee decided to do something about it. She’d noticed that I own a $3,000 Sony pro camera and keep buying more lenses — even though the only photos I ever seemed to take were of my own friends at my own parties, and the only people who ever saw my photos were the people in the photos.

“If I could get you a press pass to shoot celebrities at SXSW would you want to do it?” she asked me.

Um, yes? For a hobbyist photographer, it was a dream come true.

I went to SXSW and took photos of Conan O’Brien on stage. My photos appeared on his Wikipedia page just days after I uploaded them. That was the start of WikiPortraits, and soon, Jenny made it official, founding a 501(c)(3) nonprofit with Wikipedia veteran Kevin Payravi.

That was two years ago. Since then, I’ve traveled to film festivals and cultural events around the world, including Sundance, the Toronto Film Festival, Edinburgh Fringe, the International Festival of Journalism in Perugia, the Nobel Prizes in Stockholm and Oslo, the Locarno Film Festival in Switzerland, and the Busan Film Festival in Korea.

Today, my photos alone are viewed by 10 million people a month.

Collectively, WikiPortraits photos are viewed more than 150 million times a month, across articles in over 150 languages. WikiPortraits photographers have covered dozens of festivals and ceremonies and taken nearly 5,000 freely-licensed photos.

When we apply for press credentials and the online form asks “What is the total readership of your publication,” we say 1.5 billion people.

We usually get credentialed.

“For the love of God, please take down that photo.”

At a New York screening of The Apprentice, I found Jeremy Strong of Succession, whose Wikipedia photo was from 2014. His publicist said no. Then Jeremy overheard: “Wait, you’re from Wikipedia? For the love of God, please take down that photo. You’d be doing me a service, I’d be forever in your debt.” He posed and I got the shot.

Jeremy Strong's 2014 Wikipedia photoPortrait of Jeremy Strong by Jay Dixit

Mr. Strong happily sat for a portrait, emphasizing his eagerness to see his existing Wikipedia photo replaced.

The trick on a red carpet isn’t getting a natural expression. These are professional actors — they always look good on camera. The trick is getting them to look at your lens when every photographer in the pit is shouting their name. I’ve tried wearing a red Switzerland flag hat and yelling “over here in the red hat!” I’ve called people by their character names. I got Ana de Armas’s attention by saying, “Oye, Ana, por aqui, por favor!” She looked right at me and gave me the sweetest smile. Click, got the shot.

But WikiPortraits isn’t just about getting better photos. Because everything we shoot is freely licensed, our images are free for anyone to use, including news outlets that can’t afford Getty or the wire services, from Brazil to Serbia to Japan. And most notable people of color still aren’t represented on Wikipedia with a good portrait, or any portrait at all. Closing that gap is a big part of why the project exists. Wikipedia shapes how the world sees people. When the photo is bad, or missing, that’s a problem worth fixing.

Jenny and Kevin keep pushing us into new kinds of events, from the Jaipur Literature Festival to CES in Las Vegas. We’re a team of more than 50 volunteer photographers, and we’re just getting started.

If you want to join us, help fund travel and gear, or just learn more, visit WikiPortraits.org or get in touch.